Le règne de la mécanisation : l’organisation vue comme une machine

• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism : High‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21 century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25 45.
• Campion, M. (1995). The supposed demise of bureaucracy : Implications for distance education and open learning—More on the post‐Fordism debate. Distance Education, 16(2), 192 216.
• Foropon, C., & McLachlin, R. (2013). Metaphors in operations management theory building. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(2), 181 196.
• Maravelias, C. (2003). Post‐bureaucracy – control through professional freedom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 547 566.
• Morgana, L. (2012). Un précurseur du New Public Management : Henri Fayol (1841-1925). Gestion et management public, 1/n°2(2), 4.
• Mousli, M. (2006). Taylor et l'organisation scientifique du travail. Alternatives Économiques, 251(10), 83-83.
• Mumby, D. K. (2015). Organizing Power. Review of Communication, 15(1), 19 38.
• Munro, I., & Huber, C. (2012). Kafka’s mythology : Organization, bureaucracy and the limits of sensemaking. Human Relations, 65(4), 523 543.
• Mutch, A. (2006). Organization Theory and Military Metaphor : Time for a Reappraisal? Organization, 13(6), 751 769.
• Nadolny, A., & Ryan, S. (2015). McUniversities revisited : A comparison of university and McDonald’s casual employee experiences in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 142 157.
• Pruijt, H. (2000). Repainting, modifying, smashing Taylorism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(5), 439 451.
• Pruijt, H. (2003). Teams between Neo-Taylorism and Anti-Taylorism. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1), 77 101.
• Wallon, H. (2012). Taylorisme, rationalisation, sélection, orientation. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, (14‑2).

La nature intervient : l’organisation vue comme un organisme

• Accard, P. (2019). Criticality : How Changes Preserve Stability in Self-Organizing Systems. Organization Studies, 40(11), 1613 1629.
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. 21(4), 429 449.
• Aldrich, H. E., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., & Vanberg, V. J. (2008). In defence of generalized Darwinism. 18(5), 577 596.
• Baum, J.A.C. and Amburgey, T.L. (2017). Organizational Ecology. In The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, J.A.C. Baum (Ed.). https://doi-org.tlqprox.teluq.ca/10.1002/9781405164061.ch13
• Bouchamma, Y., & Michaud, C. (s. d.). Analyse des pratiques des acteurs scolaires travaillant en communauté de pratique (CP) à travers leurs métaphores. 41(2), 178
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14(3), 418 434.
• Brozovic, D., Ravald, A., & Nordin, F. (2015). Making sense of service dynamics : The honeybee metaphor. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 634 644.
• Drucker, P. (Ed.). (2011). The Ecological Vision: Reflections on the American Condition (1st ed.). Routledge.
• Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural Diversity at Work : The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229.
• Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability Leadership : Co-creating a Sustainable Future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25 35.
• Frelin, A., & Grannäs, J. (2015). Direct and indirect educational relationships : Developing a typology for the contribution of different categories of school staff in relation to students’ educational experiences. Improving Schools, 18(1), 56 68.
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective Efficacy Beliefs:Theoretical Developments, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3 13.
• Groutel, E. (2014). Mary Parker Follett La facette méconnue du management jardiné. Revue française de gestion, 239(2), 13-29.
• Ibert, J. (2004). La gestion paradoxale des relations entre firmes concurrentes. Revue française de gestion, 158(1), 153-177.
• Jones, R. L. (2017). Enterprise Fintech: A Metaphor For Modern Organizations. American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences.
• Kay, R. (s. d.). Are organizations autopoietic ? A call for new debate. 18(6), 461 477.
• Kragh, S. U., & Djursaa, M. (s. d.). Modernization and management : Business school teaching across countries. 6(1), 19 36.
• Lee, S. M., Olson, D. L., & Trimi, S. (2012). Co‐innovation : Convergenomics, collaboration, and co‐creation for organizational values. Management Decision, 50(5), 817 831.
• Lenay Blason, A. & Alexandra. (s. d.). La métaphore comme « symptôme ». 34, 54 66.
• Lester, D. L., Parnell, J. A., & Carraher, S. (2003). Organizational life cycle : A five-stage empirical scale. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11(4), 339 354.
• Lomas, T., Medina, J. C., Ivtzan, I., Rupprecht, S., Hart, R., & Eiroa-Orosa, F. J. (2017). The impact of mindfulness on well-being and performance in the workplace : An inclusive systematic review of the empirical literature. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 492 513.
• MacKay, R. B., & Chia, R. (2013). Choice, Chance, and Unintended Consequences in Strategic Change : A Process Understanding of the Rise and Fall of NorthCo Automotive. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 208 230.
• May, G. L., & Short, D. (s. d.). Gardening in Cyberspace : A Metaphor to Enhance Online Teaching and Learning. 27(6), 673 693.
• Melé, D. (s. d.). The Firm as a “Community of Persons” : A Pillar of Humanistic Business Ethos. 106(1), 89 101.
• Miller, R. J., & Rowan, B. (2006). Effects of Organic Management on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 219 253.
• Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building Sustainable Organizations : The Human Factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34 45.
• Remoussenard, C., & Ansiau, D. (s. d.). Bien-être émotionnel au travail et changement organisationnel. 15.
• Roy, M., & Audet, M. (2002). La transformation vers de nouvelles formes d’organisation plus flexibles : Un cadre de référence. Gestion, 27(4), 43.
• Rusk, R. D., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Waters, L. (2018). A complex dynamic systems approach to lasting positive change : The Synergistic Change Model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 406 418.
• Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer‐seller relationships, and social media. Management Decision, 50(2), 253 272.
• Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing Social-Business Tensions : A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(3), 407 442.
• Tremblay, G., & Freire Vieira, P. (2012). Le rôle de l’université dans le développement local : Expériences brésiliennes et québécoises. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
• Wheeler, M. S., Arnkoff, D. B., & Glass, C. R. (s. d.). The Neuroscience of Mindfulness : How Mindfulness Alters the Brain and Facilitates Emotion Regulation. 8(6), 1471 1487.

Vers l’auto-organisation : l’organisation vue comme un cerveau

• Abawi, L. (2013). Metaphor : Powerful imagery bringing learning and teaching to life. Improving Schools, 16(2), 130 147.
• Akinci, C., & Sadler-Smith, E. (s. d.). Intuition in Management Research : A Historical Review. 14(1), 104 122.
• Blau, I., Grinberg, R., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2018). Pedagogical Perspectives and Practices Reflected in Metaphors of Learning and Digital Learning of ICT Leaders. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 32 48.
• Bokeno, R. M. (2003). The work of Chris Argyris as critical organization practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(6), 633 649.
• Chia, R. (2003). From Knowledge-Creation to the Perfecting of Action : Tao, Basho and Pure Experience as the Ultimate Ground of Knowing. Human Relations, 56(8), 953 981.
• Desjardins, M. K., & Desjardins, C. (2016). L’académie BMO groupe financier, une initiative en or. Gestion, 41(1), 50.
• Garud, R., & Kotha, S. (1994). Using the Brain as a Metaphor to Model Flexible Production Systems. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 671 698.
• Gray, J. R. (2004). Integration of Emotion and Cognitive Control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 46 48.
• Heylighen, F., & Lenartowicz, M. (2017). The Global Brain as a model of the future information society : An introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 1 6.
• Landry, S., & Gril, E. (2017). L’amélioration continue pour construire l’organisation apprenante. Gestion, 42(4), 96.
• Last, C. (2014). Global Brain and the Future of Human Society. World Futures Review, 6(2), 143 150.
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking Leadership to Student Learning : The Contributions of Leader Efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496 528.
• Martín-de-Castro, G., Delgado-Verde, M., López-Sáez, P., & Navas-López, J. E. (s. d.). Towards ‘An Intellectual Capital-Based View of the Firm’ : Origins and Nature. 98(4), 649 662.
• McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation : The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676 694.
• Örtenblad, A. (2018). What does “learning organization” mean? The Learning Organization, 25(3), 150 158.
• Paquay, L. (2005). Devenir des enseignants et formateurs professionnels dans une ‘organisation apprenante’ ? De l’utopie à la réalité! European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 111 128.
• Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-Based Intuition and Decision Making in Organizations. Journal of Management, 36(4), 941 973.
• Schoeneborn, D., Blaschke, S., & Kaufmann, I. M. (2013). Recontextualizing Anthropomorphic Metaphors in Organization Studies : The Pathology of Organizational Insomnia. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(4), 435 450.

Exposer les logiques du changement : l’organisation vue comme flux et transformation

• Atkinson, D. (2008). Dancing “the management” : On social presence, rhythm and finding common purpose. Management Decision, 46(7), 1081 1095.
• Brown, K. M. (2004). Leadership for Social Justice and Equity : Weaving a Transformative Framework and Pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77 108.
• Calabretta, G., Gemser, G., & Wijnberg, N. M. (2017). The Interplay between Intuition and Rationality in Strategic Decision Making : A Paradox Perspective. Organization Studies, 38(3 4), 365 401.
• Chia, R. (2002). Essai : Time, Duration and Simultaneity : Rethinking Process and Change in Organizational Analysis. Organization Studies, 23(6), 863 868.
• Clarke, J., & Holt, R. (2017). Imagery of ad-venture : Understanding entrepreneurial identity through metaphor and drawing. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 476 497.
• Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management Paradoxes : A Relational View. Human Relations, 55(5), 483 503.
• Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. (2008). The Emergent Organization : Primary and Complex Metaphors in Theorizing about Organizations. Organization Studies, 29(7), 957 978.
• Dyck, B., & Greidanus, N. S. (2017). Quantum Sustainable Organizing Theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(1), 32 46.
• Erwin, D. G., & Garman, A. N. (2010). Resistance to organizational change : Linking research and practice. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(1), 39 56.
• Gaim, M., & Waahlin, N. (2016). In search of a creative space : A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 32(1), 33 44.
• Guilmot, N. (2016). Les paradoxes comme source de resistance au changement. Revue Française de Gestion, 42(258), 29 44.
• Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a Metatheoretical Perspective Sharpening the Focus and Widening the Scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127 149.
• Lips-Wiersma, M. (2004). Furthering Management and Spirituality Education through the Use of Paradox. Journal of Management Education, 28(1), 119 133.
• Maimone, F., & Sinclair, M. (2014). Dancing in the dark : Creativity, knowledge creation and (emergent) organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(2), 344 361.
• Ofori-Dankwa, J., & Julian, S. D. (2004). Conceptualizing social science paradoxes using the diversity and similarity curves model : Illustrations from the work/play and theory novelty/continuity paradoxes. Human Relations, 57(11), 1449 1477.
• Peng, K.-L., Lin, P. M. C., & Ren, L. (2016). Ice Bucket Challenge, Butterfly Effect, and Hotels’ Strategic Configurations – The Case of the Hotel Industry in China. Journal of China Tourism Research, 12(2), 252 270.
• Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-Based Intuition and Decision Making in Organizations. Journal of Management, 36(4), 941 973.
• Schoeneborn, D., Vásquez, C., & Cornelissen, J. (2016). Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy : Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human Relations, 69(4), 915 944.
• Staudenmayer, N., Tyre, M., & Perlow, L. (2002). Time to Change : Temporal Shifts as Enablers of Organizational Change. Organization Science, 13(5), 583 597.
• Stevenson, B. W., & Stevenson, B. W. (s. d.). Application Of Systemic And Complexity Thinking In Organizational Development. 14(2), 86 99.
• Thiétart, R. A., & Forgues, B. (1995). Chaos Theory and Organization. Organization Science, 6(1), 19 31.
• Thiétart, R.-A., & Forgues, B. (2006). La dialectique de l’ordre et du chaos dans les organisations. Revue française de gestion, 32(160), 47 66.

Création de la réalité sociale : l’organisation vue comme une culture

• Abawi, L. (2013). School meaning systems : The symbiotic nature of culture and ‘language-in-use’. Improving Schools, 16(2), 89 106.
• Brown, K. M. (2004). Leadership for Social Justice and Equity : Weaving a Transformative Framework and Pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77 108.
• Bustamante, R. M., Nelson, J. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2009). Assessing Schoolwide Cultural Competence : Implications for School Leadership Preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 793 827.
• Daniel, E., Hofmann-Towfigh, N., & Knafo, A. (2013). School Values Across Three Cultures : A Typology and Interrelations. SAGE Open, 3(2), 2158244013482469.
• Diebold, S. (2012). Le leader est-il un faiseur d’histoires ? Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, XVIII(46), 159 171.
• Dreyfuss, L., & Rascol-Boutard, S. (s. d.). À la frontière du réel : Les séries américaines, une inspiration pour comprendre les dynamiques organisationnelles. 94(4), 15.
• Dumay, X. (s. d.). Origins and Consequences of Schools’ Organizational Culture for Student Achievement. 45(4), 523 555.
• Faith, K. (Éd.). (2017). Toward New Horizons for Women in Distance Education : International Perspectives. Routledge.
• Grisham, T. (2006). Metaphor, poetry, storytelling and cross‐cultural leadership. Management Decision, 44(4), 486 503.
• Hides, S. (s. d.). The Ideology of Performative Pedagogies : A cultural symptomology. 2(4).
• Maimone, F. (2018). Culture, Glocalization, Complexity. Dans Intercultural Knowledge Sharing in MNCs (p. 17 35). Springer International Publishing.
• Mangin, M. M. (s. d.). Building Relationships Step by Step : One Teacher Leader’s Journey. 13(2), 13 20.
• Merryfield, M. M. (s. d.). The Paradoxes of Teaching a Multicultural Education Course Online. 52(4), 283 299.
• Mills, K. A. (s. d.). The Culture of the Christian School. 7(2), 129 142.
• Poore, P. (s. d.). School culture : The space between the bars; the silence between the notes. 4(3), 351 361.
• Riehl, C. J. (2000). The Principal’s Role in Creating Inclusive Schools for Diverse Students : A Review of Normative, Empirical, and Critical Literature on the Practice of Educational Administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55 81.
• Roberts, A. (s. d.). Transposing a culture : Reflections on the leadership of a closing school®. 8(3), 237 253.
• Sabar, B. (s. d.). Education as culture mapping : Schooling among Chuktia Bhunjia girls. 40(3), 257 273.
• Salah, L. H. (s. d.). Diagnostic culturel : Regain d’intérêt pour des composantes trop souvent occultées. Cas d’une PME tunisienne de Télécommunications. n° 254(2), 109 116.
• Scanlon, L. (2012). ‘Why didn’t they ask me?’ : Student perspectives on a school improvement initiative. Improving Schools, 15(3), 185 197.
• Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (s. d.). Faculty Trust and Organizational School Characteristics. 45(4), 556 589.
• Walker, D., Mahon, E., & Dray, B. (2017). Can We Prepare Culturally and Linguistically Responsive Teachers Online ? A Cross-Case Analysis of Online and On-Campus Courses. Urban Education, 004208591773597.

Intérêt, conflit et pouvoir : l’organisation vue comme un système politique

• Babeau, O., & Chanlat, J.-F. (2008). La transgression, une dimension oubliée de l’organisation. Revue française de gestion, 34(183), 201 219.
• Ball, S. J. (s. d.). The Micro-Politics of the School. Routledge.
• Brown, K. M. (2004). Leadership for Social Justice and Equity : Weaving a Transformative Framework and Pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77 108.
• Bruna, M. G. (2013). Le portage d’une politique diversité comme processus de changement organisationnel : Phénoménologie et jeux d’acteurs. Question(s) de management, 3(2), 25.
• Brunsson, N., & Geoffroy, F. (2012). Quand l’hypocrisie managériale protège l’organisation. Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, XVIII(46), 301.
• Buch, E. (s. d.). Le chef d’orchestre. Pratiques de l’autorité et métaphores politiques. 57(4), 1001 1028.
• Burnette, D. M. (s. d.). Negotiating the mine field : Strategies for effective online education administrative leadership in higher education institutions. 16(3), 13 25.
• Cambron-McCabe, N., & McCarthy, M. M. (2005). Educating School Leaders for Social Justice. Educational Policy, 19(1), 201 222.
• Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R., & Zundel, M. (2011). The Role of Analogy and Metaphor in the Framing and Legitimization of Strategic Change. Organization Studies, 32(12), 1701 1716.
• Guillaume, C., & Pochic, S. (2007). La fabrication organisationnelle des dirigeants Un regard sur le plafond de verre. Travail, genre et sociétés, No 17(1), 79.
• Huddleston, L. (2014). Using a Crisis to Redefine School Culture. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 17(4), 78 85.
• Hudson, C. (2007). Governing the Governance of Education : The State Strikes Back? European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 266 282.
• Jackson, S. (2016). Understanding IS/IT implementation through metaphors : A multi-metaphor stakeholder analysis in an educational setting. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1039 1051.
• Kanter, R. M. (2011). Zoom in, zoom out. Harvard business review, 89(3), 112 116, 131.
• Levy, D., & Scully, M. (2007). The Institutional Entrepreneur as Modern Prince : The Strategic Face of Power in Contested Fields. Organization Studies, 28(7), 971 991.
• Maroy, C., & Vaillancourt, S. (2013). Le discours syndical face à la nouvelle gestion publique dans le système éducatif québécois. Education et sociétés, 32(2), 93.
• Milne, M. J., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating Adventures in Wonderland : The Journey Metaphor and Environmental Sustainability. Organization, 13(6), 801 839.
• Vas, A. (2005). Les processus de changement organisational à l'épreuve des faits : une approche multiparadigmatique. Management International, 9(2), 21-36.
• Vinokur, A. (2008). Vous avez dit « autonomie » ? Mouvements, 55 56(3), 72.
• Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance : An introduction. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 3 13.

En explorant la caverne de Platon : l’organisation vue comme une prison du psychisme

• Amado, G., & Amato, R. (s. d.). Organizational change theories and practices : A critical review. Dans The Transitional Approach to Change (p. 29 85).
• Boddy, C. R. (s. d.). Corporate Psychopaths, Bullying and Unfair Supervision in the Workplace. 100(3), 367 379.
• Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Entrepreneur‐mentality, gender and the study of women entrepreneurs. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(3), 256 268.
• Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality : Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 110 127.
• De Klerk, J. J. (2017). “The Devil Made Me Do It!” An Inquiry Into the Unconscious “Devils Within” of Rationalized Corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(3), 254 269.
• Djabi, M., & Chanlat, J.-F. (2014). L’identification à l’organisation en contexte de changement. Le cas de la SNCF. Revue française de gestion, 40(238), 33 57.
• Furnham, A. (s. d.). The Psychology of Behaviour at Work. Routledge.
• Johnson, N. J., & Klee, T. (2007). Passive-Aggressive Behavior and Leadership Styles in Organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(2), 130 142.
• Kemp, L. J. (2016). ‘Trapped’ by metaphors for organizations : Thinking and seeing women’s equality and inequality. Human Relations, 69(4), 975 1000.
• Leymarie, S., & Muller, R. (2011). L’être-sujet. Revue internationale de psychosociologie, XVII(43), 213.
• McCabe, D. (2016). ‘Curiouser and curiouser!’ : Organizations as Wonderland – a metaphorical alternative to the rational model. Human Relations, 69(4), 945 973.
• Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605.
• Ouimet, G. (2010). Comment gérer des personnes pathologiquement réfractaires à l’autorité? Gestion, 35(1), 18.
• Ouimet, G. (2011). Criminel en col blanc de grande envergure. Un renard bien cravaté. Psychologie Française, 56(4), 239 258.
• Reina, C. S., Zhang, Z., & Peterson, S. J. (2014). CEO grandiose narcissism and firm performance : The role of organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 958 971.
• Rhodes, C., Pullen, A., Vickers, M. H., Clegg, S. R., & Pitsis, A. (2010). Violence and Workplace Bullying : What Are an Organization’s Ethical Responsibilities? Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 96 115.
• Ruth, D. (2014). Leader as priest : Plucking the fruit of a flawed metaphor. Leadership, 10(2), 174 190.
• Stefanich, F. (2016). Le leader charismatique en Amérique latine. Le cas Carlos Menem. Sociétés, 133(3), 37.
• Tourish, D., & Hargie, O. (2012). Metaphors of Failure and the Failures of Metaphor : A Critical Study of Root Metaphors used by Bankers in Explaining the Banking Crisis. Organization Studies, 33(8), 1045 1069.
• Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132 142.
• Zimmerman, T., & Amori, G. (s. d.). The silent organizational pathology of insidious intimidation. 30(3), 5 15.

Le côté répugnant : l’organisation vue comme instrument de domination

• Association internationale des sociologues de langue française & Daniel, D. (s. d.). Le nouveau modèle de pouvoir et de domination au travail dans le mode de production postfordiste.
• Ball, K. (2005). Organization, Surveillance and the Body : Towards a Politics of Resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89 108.
• Chatelain-Ponroy, S. & Stéphanie. (s. d.). Une voie de compréhension du contrôle de gestion dans les organisations non marchandes : La métaphore de l’iceberg. Vol 27/3, 73 103.
• Chiapello, È., & Gilbert, P. (2012). Les outils de gestion : Producteurs ou régulateurs de la violence psychique au travail ? Le travail humain, 75(1), 1.
• Clegg, S. (s. d.). The Theory of Power and Organization (RLE: Organizations). Routledge.
• Deranty, J.-P. (2011). Travail et expérience de la domination dans le néolibéralisme contemporain. Actuel Marx, 49(1), 73.
• Fleming, P. (2005). Metaphors of Resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 45 66.
• Jermier, J. M., & Forbes, L. C. (2016). Metaphors, organizations and water : Generating new images for environmental sustainability. Human Relations, 69(4), 1001 1027.
• Kemp, L. J. (2016). ‘Trapped’ by metaphors for organizations : Thinking and seeing women’s equality and inequality. Human Relations, 69(4), 975 1000.
• Leclerc, C., Bonneau, M., Sabourin, C., & Fédération québécoise des professeures et professeurs d’université. Comité ad hoc sur la propriété intellectuelle. (2006). Le harcèlement psychologique chez les professeures et professeurs d’université : témoignages, analyse et pistes d’action pour les syndicats. Fédération québécoise des professeures et professeurs d’université.
• Leclerc, C., Sabourin, C., & Bonneau, M. (s. d.). La collégialité détournée : Les racines organisationnelles du harcèlement psychologique dans les universités. 7.
• Linhart, D. (2011). De la domination et de son déni. Actuel Marx, 49(1), 90.
• Linstead, S. A., & Maréchal, G. (2015). Re-reading masculine organization : Phallic, testicular and seminal metaphors. Human Relations, 68(9), 1461 1489.
• Maravelias, C. (2003). Post‐bureaucracy – control through professional freedom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 547 566.