Le règne de la mécanisation : l’organisation vue comme une machine

• Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism : High‐stakes testing and the standardization of the 21 century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25 45.
• Campion, M. (1995). The supposed demise of bureaucracy : Implications for distance education and open learning—More on the post‐Fordism debate. Distance Education, 16(2), 192 216.
• Foropon, C., & McLachlin, R. (2013). Metaphors in operations management theory building. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(2), 181 196.
• Maravelias, C. (2003). Post‐bureaucracy – control through professional freedom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 547 566.
• Morgana, L. (2012). Un précurseur du New Public Management : Henri Fayol (1841-1925). Gestion et management public, 1/n°2(2), 4.
• Mousli, M. (2006). Taylor et l'organisation scientifique du travail. Alternatives Économiques, 251(10), 83-83.
• Mumby, D. K. (2015). Organizing Power. Review of Communication, 15(1), 19 38.
• Munro, I., & Huber, C. (2012). Kafka’s mythology : Organization, bureaucracy and the limits of sensemaking. Human Relations, 65(4), 523 543.
• Mutch, A. (2006). Organization Theory and Military Metaphor : Time for a Reappraisal? Organization, 13(6), 751 769.
• Nadolny, A., & Ryan, S. (2015). McUniversities revisited : A comparison of university and McDonald’s casual employee experiences in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 142 157.
• Pruijt, H. (2000). Repainting, modifying, smashing Taylorism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(5), 439 451.
• Pruijt, H. (2003). Teams between Neo-Taylorism and Anti-Taylorism. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1), 77 101.
• Wallon, H. (2012). Taylorisme, rationalisation, sélection, orientation. Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé, (14‑2).

La nature intervient : l’organisation vue comme un organisme

• Accard, P. (2019). Criticality : How Changes Preserve Stability in Self-Organizing Systems. Organization Studies, 40(11), 1613 1629.
• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. 21(4), 429 449.
• Aldrich, H. E., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., & Vanberg, V. J. (2008). In defence of generalized Darwinism. 18(5), 577 596.
• Baum, J.A.C. and Amburgey, T.L. (2017). Organizational Ecology. In The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, J.A.C. Baum (Ed.). https://doi-org.tlqprox.teluq.ca/10.1002/9781405164061.ch13
• Bouchamma, Y., & Michaud, C. (s. d.). Analyse des pratiques des acteurs scolaires travaillant en communauté de pratique (CP) à travers leurs métaphores. 41(2), 178
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14(3), 418 434.
• Brozovic, D., Ravald, A., & Nordin, F. (2015). Making sense of service dynamics : The honeybee metaphor. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 634 644.
• Drucker, P. (Ed.). (2011). The Ecological Vision: Reflections on the American Condition (1st ed.). Routledge.
• Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural Diversity at Work : The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and Outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229.
• Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability Leadership : Co-creating a Sustainable Future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25 35.
• Kragh, S. U., & Djursaa, M. (s. d.). Modernization and management : Business school teaching across countries. 6(1), 19 36.